Sam Parish 5/21/2014 12:32:55 PM
Re: "via SAML 2.0 compatible identity provider"
The previous suggested SQRL sign in technology is not third party, so not sure if my comments here may have disrupted the Idea Exchange log for this idea (Sorry-if that is the case Kirill). However, as we can see from this technology example, fully secure and encrypted sign-in does not require third party provider, so this can be relevant to this post.
I will be quiet now.